Welcome to Manifest-I

Welcome to Manifest-I the blog of Manifest Information Services Ltd. Here we take a wide ranging view of topical governance and stewardship issues. Please feel free to add your comments and join the debate. Sign up to receive free weekly updates.

Manifest is a signatory of the Best Practice Principles for Shareholder Voting Research

Delivering Diverse Viewpoints

In the pursuit of secure investment returns, diverse viewpoints based on high-quality data and varied information are critical for portfolio construction. We believe that share ownership is no different. Manifest intelligently navigates the complexities of global governance and voting delivering actionable and defensible stewardship insights.

Manifest: showing, not telling

Get in touch to find out more about Manifest's governance research, data and advisory services

Treasury Select Committee calls for governance overhaul

Banks were ownerless corporations whose shareholders gave their governance role a low priority. That’s just one of  the damning conclusions from the UK’s Treasury Committee which has released its third report on the Banking Crisis. The report entitled “Banking Crisis: reforming corporate governance and pay in the City” has a wide brief looking not just at City pay but also the wider network of players involved in the crisis: non-executive directors;  institutional shareholders;  auditors and credit rating agencies, all of whom, the report states, “failed to act as a check on, and balance to, senior managers and the executive boards of banks.”

On Non-executive Directors

Although it will come as no surprise to governance veterans, John McFall, Chairman of the Committee has expressed his “shock” at finding that non-executive directors are holding down multiple senior roles  saying “This simply cannot have given them the time to conduct proper oversight. Too often seemingly eminent and highly-regarded individuals failed to act as an effective check on, and challenge to, executive managers, instead operating as members of a ‘cosy club.’ Such incestuous and frankly ineffective behaviour must come to an end.”

The report highlights three problems: the lack of time many non-executives commit to their role, with many combining a senior full-time position with multiple non-executive directorships; in many instances a lack of expertise; and a lack of diversity.  It calls for a broadening of the talent pool from which the banks draw upon, possible restrictions on the number of directorships an individual can hold, dedicated support or a secretariat to help non-executives carry out their responsibilities effectively, reforms to ensure greater banking expertise amongst non-executives directors, as well as stronger links between non-executive directors and institutional shareholders.

On Shareholders

The Committee has called into question the commitment of institutional investors to governance concluding that fragmented and dispersed ownership, combined with the costs of detailed engagement with firms by shareholders, resulted in the phenomenon of ‘ownerless corporations’.

Commenting on the role of shareholders McFall said: “The failure of institutional investors has been another sobering lesson to emerge from the banking crisis. Their engagement with the banks prior to the crisis was often too weak or non-existent, allowing bank executives to operate in a vacuum. Policymakers need to focus on how we can promote more effective shareholder engagement. There is a degree to which seemingly ownerless corporations were allowed to operate outside the bounds of accountability; this must end.”

On Remuneration Consultants

The Report also proposes a number of reforms to remuneration more widely in the banking sector. These include enhanced disclosure requirements on firms about their remuneration structures and about remuneration below board-level, reforms to remuneration committees to make them more open and transparent, and a Code of Ethics for remuneration consultants.
On Auditors

While not concluding that the auditors failed shareholder completely, the Report suggests that the audit process failed to highlight the banks problems. The Committee is now questioning the value and usefulness of the audit in its current forms and has called on the FSA to consult on ways financial reporting can be improved. Auditor independence comes under  the spotlight highlighting the long-held concerns of many investors and argues that investor confidence and trust in audit may be enhanced by a prohibition on audit firms conducting non-audit work for the same company.


The following is a link to the HTML version of the complete report

What do you think?